ParkerVision Pushes for Supreme Court Review Amidst Growing Support

Introduction

ParkerVision, Inc. has gained renewed attention regarding its petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, as the company engages in a high-stakes patent dispute against TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. and LG Electronics Inc. The petition, case number 24-518, challenges the Federal Circuit’s practice of issuing one-word affirmances in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) appeals, which ParkerVision argues contradicts Section 144 of the Patent Act that mandates written opinions in such cases.

Podcast Highlights Support

The recent episode of the Patently Strategic podcast has contributed to increased visibility for the case, drawing significant listener engagement from its launch. The podcast hosts discussions about the implications of ParkerVision's petition and has reportedly spurred interest from various legal circles, including an article featured on IPWatchdog.

Backing from Former Judges

Notably, retired Federal Circuit Judges Paul Michel and Kathleen O'Malley have publicly endorsed ParkerVision's arguments. Judge Michel has articulated that the Federal Circuit’s practice of issuing judgments without detailed opinions contradicts Section 144’s requirements. Judge O'Malley emphasized the case's importance, warning that it jeopardizes property rights protection.

Consensus Among Legal Experts

A recent webinar debate hosted by the Federalist Society revealed a unanimous sentiment among legal experts in favor of granting ParkerVision’s petition. This broad consensus indicates widespread support for the legal principles at stake.

Amicus Support and Wider Implications

ParkerVision's petition has also attracted amicus briefs from various stakeholders, including inventors’ groups and notable figures such as Professor Mary Ann Glendon from Harvard Law School. These brief submissions underline the call for Supreme Court review, highlighting the vital role of written opinions in maintaining judicial integrity.

Upcoming Supreme Court Consideration

The Supreme Court is scheduled to review ParkerVision’s petition on March 21. This decision could have significant ramifications for patent law and the rights of inventors.

Key Takeaways

ParkerVision seeks Supreme Court review challenging the Federal Circuit's issuance of one-word affirmances.

Support from former Federal judges strengthens the case's legitimacy and highlights its judicial implications.

The case has garnered widespread backing from the legal community, including influential legal organizations.

Amicus briefs emphasize the necessity of written opinions in the patent system.

The Supreme Court will consider the petition on March 21, which may reshape patent law practices.